SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017607

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ASHISH TOMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, SL. orders or proceedings or Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPCRL No. 91 of 2024 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J .

Mr. M.S. Pal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Medha Pande, learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. Mr. G.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Apoorv Chauhan, learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

4. The present Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners- Ashish Tomar, S/o Arun Tomar, and Vishesh Tomar, S/o Vikram Singh against the Respondents, particularly Respondent Nos. 3 and 4- Ankit Singh, S/o Upendra Kumar Singh, and Anjaney Rai, S/o Santosh Kumar Rai.

5. It is submitted that Mr. M.S. Pal, learned Senior Counsel, has pointed out a typographical error in the Petition, wherein "S/o" has been erroneously typed as "C/o".

6. The present Petition is filed with the following prayers:

“(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing F.I.R. No. 0331/2023, registered under Sections 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Rajpur, District Dehradun, Uttarakhan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top