SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017653

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MEHMOOD KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 810 of 2024

03 December, 2025 Mehmood Khan --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand & others --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. M.C. Kandpal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Devesh Kandpal, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Devendra Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

Mr. Yogesh Pandey, learned counsel for respondent nos.3 to 6.

None appears for the respondent-Gram Sabha.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)

By means of present writ petition, petitioner has put to challenge the order dated 28.12.2023, passed by Board of Revenue, whereby the revision-petition filed by respondent nos.3 to 6 was allowed and the matter was remanded back to the Additional Commissioner, Kumaon Division, Nainital.

2. The facts of the case, which resulted in the filing of the revenue revision by respondent nos. 3 to 6, are that an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the Additional Commissioner, Kumaon Division, Nainital, against the judgment and decree dated 24.01.2013 passed by the Assis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top