HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KUNDAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders or S N L o. .
Date p d r ir o e c c e t e i d on in s g a s n o d r COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS No. 1593 of 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Vishwast Kandal & Mr. Akshay Joshi, Advocates for the petitioner.
2. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Proceedings under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972 were initiated against petitioner by issuing a notice under Section 4(1) thereof. Petitioner appeared before Prescribed Authority, but did not file any reply / objection. Prescribed Authority, after hearing the oral submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, passed eviction order against him on 20.02.2024.
4. Petitioner challenged the eviction order in an appeal under Section 9 of the aforesaid Act. The appeal has been dismissed by learned District Judge, Nainital vide judgment dated 28.03.2025. Thus, feeling aggrieved by the order passed by learned Prescribed Authority as affirmed by learned District Judge, petitioner has approached this Court.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Since
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.