SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017658

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
BHUPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or S N L o. .

Date p d r ir o e c c e t e i d on in s g a s n o d r COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS No. 1597 of 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Vishwast Kandal & Mr. Akshay Joshi, Advocates for the petitioner.

2. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Proceedings under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972 were initiated against petitioner by issuing a notice under Section 4(1) thereof. Petitioner appeared before Prescribed Authority, but did not file any reply / objection. Learned Prescribed Authority, after hearing the oral submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, passed eviction order against him on 20.02.2024.

4. Petitioner challenged the eviction order in an appeal under Section 9 of the aforesaid Act. The appeal has been dismissed by learned District Judge, Nainital vide judgment dated 28.03.2025. Thus, feeling aggrieved by the order passed by learned Prescribed Authority as affirmed by learned District Judge, petitioner has approached this Court.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top