SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017676

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Birender Kumar Bhadula – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or S N L o . .

Date p d r i o re c c e t e io d n in s g a s n o d r COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Registrar’s order with Signatures C482 No. 1164 of 2015 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Ms. Sarita Bisht and Mr. Piyush Sammal, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy A.G. for the State.

3. Mr. Karan Anand, learned counsel for respondent no.2.

4. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 29.07.2015 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate – II, Dehradun in Criminal Case No. 2579 of 2015 ‘State Vs. Birender Kumar Bhadula’ under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452 I.P.C.

5. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that both parties have settled their dispute amicably. Respondent no.2/complainant no longer wishes to pursue the case. A joint compounding application (IA/2159/2025), along with individual affidavits, has been filed to support this.

6. On 20.06.2025, both the petitioner and respondent no.2 appeared before the Court in person. Today, they appeared again via video conferencing and were identified by their respective lawyers.

7. On interaction, respondent no.2/ complainant state

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top