SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017747

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANJAY KUMAR ALIAS FAUJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Bail Application No. 140 of 2025 Sanjay Kumar Alias Fauji. ………………… Applicant.

Versus State of Uttarakhand. ……………Respondent.

Present:

Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the applicant.

Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General with Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the State.

Mr. Narayan Hari Gupta, learned counsel for the complainant.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. The present applicant ‘Sanjay Kumar @ Fauji’ is praying for bail in reference to First Information Report dated 30.11.2024 bearing FIR No. 0757 of 2024 P.S. Patel Nagar, District Dehradun, which was lodged against two persons namely Arjun and Sachin for the offence punishable under Section 103 of BNS, 2023.

2. This is the Second Bail Application. The First Bail Application was dismissed as not pressed on 07.04.2025.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated as he was not named in the FIR and the only two persons namely Arjun and Sachin were named in the FIR. He submits that on 01.02.2024 the applicant was called at Police Chowki for interrogation and thereafter Sachin, who w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top