HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Alok Mahra, J
POOJA TALWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. investigative relief becomes moot upon charge-sheet submission. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. absence of threat evidence negates protective directions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. petition disposed with liberty for future emergencies. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or Registrar’s order with Signatures
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
There is no representation for the petitioner.
Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.
Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate for respondent no.10.
Mr. Nandan Arya, Advocate for respondent no.11.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
“1. For taking an action in accordance with the law on the Representations, Annexures- P- 5, P-8, and P-11 which discloses a cognizable offence preferred and thereafter, to inform her about the status and decision taken on the same.
2. The investigation/inquiry of the present case may be given to some special investigation agency, who can investigate the matter in an unfair and proper manner without any favour or pressure and the private respondents be arrested at the earliest.
3. Issuing the appropriate directions to Respondent no.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.