Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Alok Mahra, J
SANJAY SINGH RANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the fir and factual background of the dispute. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. stated defenses and opposing arguments regarding anticipatory bail. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. judicial reasoning for granting anticipatory bail. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. grant of anticipatory bail subject to specified conditions. (Para 12 , 13) |
| SL. No. | Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures | COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|
Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Pramod Tiwari, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Mr. S.K. Shandiliya, learned counsel for complainant/respondent no.2.
4. Present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicants seeking grant of anticipatory bail in connection with F.I.R. No. 0069 of 2026, registered under Sections 351(2), 352, 69 of B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 at Police Station Cantt., District Dehradun.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the impugned F.I.R. has been lodged alleging therein that the applicant and the informant were w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
