Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Alok Mahra, J
PRAVESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural status and matrimonial history. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding maintenance quantum. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. maintenance ensures dignity and prevents destitution. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. dismissal of revision for lack of merit. (Para 11 , 12) |
2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy A.G. for the State.
3. Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
4. The present criminal revision has been preferred challenging the judgment and order dated 02.09.2022 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Vikasnagar, Dehradun in Criminal Misc. Case No. 02 of 2022 under Section 125 Cr.P.C., whereby maintenance at the rate of ₹6,000/- per month has been awarded in favour of respondent no.2-wife.
5. Learned counsel for the revisionist would submit that the revisionist and respondent no.2 are husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized on 26.05.2015 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies; that, due to matrimonial discord, the parties started living separately; that, thereafter, respondent no.2 instituted proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance.
6. He would further submit that the Family Court has awarded maintenance at the ra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
