SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 2082

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHD SHAMSHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Manoj Bhatt, learned Brief Holders for the State.

3. Present criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed to issue a direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the F.I.R. lodged by respondent no.3 on 30.05.2026 as F.I.R./Case Crime No.219 of 2026 for the offences punishable under Section 3/4 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marirage) Act, 2019 and Sections 126(2), 351(2), 352 of B.N.S. Police Station SIDCUL, District Haridwar; a further prayer has been made to issue a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 not to arrest the petitioner pursuance to the aforesaid F.I.R.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned F.I.R. has been lodged by respondent no.3 alleging that on 30.05.2026, while the complainant was present within the court premises, the petitioner intercepted her, abused her in filthy language, extended threats of dire consequences and, during the course of the alleged altercation, pronounced "triple talaq" to the complainant.

5. Learned counsel would further submit that the marriage between the petitioner and r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top