HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHD SHAMSHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Manoj Bhatt, learned Brief Holders for the State.
3. Present criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed to issue a direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the F.I.R. lodged by respondent no.3 on 30.05.2026 as F.I.R./Case Crime No.219 of 2026 for the offences punishable under Section 3/4 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marirage) Act, 2019 and Sections 126(2), 351(2), 352 of B.N.S. Police Station SIDCUL, District Haridwar; a further prayer has been made to issue a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 not to arrest the petitioner pursuance to the aforesaid F.I.R.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned F.I.R. has been lodged by respondent no.3 alleging that on 30.05.2026, while the complainant was present within the court premises, the petitioner intercepted her, abused her in filthy language, extended threats of dire consequences and, during the course of the alleged altercation, pronounced "triple talaq" to the complainant.
5. Learned counsel would further submit that the marriage between the petitioner and r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.