HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ramesh Chandra Khulbe
MOHINDAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
C482/2597/2019
C482 No.2597 of 2019
Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.
Mr. Kurban Ali, Adv. for the applicant.
Mr. A.K. Sah, AGA with Ms. Preeta Bhatt,
B.H. for the State/ respondent no.1.
By means of this petition, the petitioner has
prayed to quash the proceedings of Crl. Case No.460
of 2017 u/s 26(B) and 26(G) of the Indian Forest
Act, pending before the Court of Addl. CJM,
Kotdwar, Pauri Garhwal.
Facts, in brief, are that on 01.01.2017, at
about 03.10 hours, a First Information Report was
lodged against the applicant and co-accused at
Police Station Kotwali Kotdwar, District-Pauri
Garhwal stating therein that a secret information is
received by the police that certain persons are
staying in Kolu Guest House of Forest Department
situated in Kothuli Range of Lansdowne Forest
Division, District Pauri Garhwal. These persons are
having huge stocks of liquor as well as illegal
weapons. On said information, a team was
constituted comprising of Station House Officer/
Senior Sub Inspector of different police stations.
They proceeded to the place on 31.12.2016. The
team comprising of police persons raided the
premises of the forest guest house and found certain
weapons for which licenses were issued to the
concerned persons. The police also recovered some
quantity of liquor from the guest house. It is stated
that the woods were lit in an open space and tents
were pitched. While checking the documents
regarding permission to stay in forest guest house
inside reserved forest, the same depicted that the
permission was issued only to a particular individual
and there was no permission with regard to 4 stay of
other persons though there were approximately 50
persons present.
It is argued that initially, the impugned
summoning order along with the entire proceedings
of Crl. Case No.460 of 2017 have been quashed
against other co-accused by the Co-ordinate Bench
of this Court in C482 No.635 of 2017 and batch,
vide judgment dated 23.10.2018; moreover, as
against co-accused Sarvdeep Mann and Aarif
Hussain Chechi, the proceedings were quashed by
this Court in C482 Application Nos.783/17 and
784/17 vide separate judgments dated 15.7.2019;
there is no evidence against the present applicant;
neither any weapon nor any cartridge were
recovered from his possession; and simply, the
charge-sheet u/s 26B and 26G has been submitted
against him.
Learned State Counsel, though opposed the
application but admitted the factum of quashing of
proceedings qua co-accused.
Since the charge-sheet has been quashed
against other accused, no specific allegation is made
against the present applicant and rather general
allegations have been made against him in the FIR
that he was also present in the forest area along with
co-accused, thus, on the ground of parity, the present
applicant also deserves the same relief.
In view of the above, the present C482
application is allowed. The entire proceedings of
Crl. Case No.460 of 2017 under Section 26B and
26G of the Indian Forest Act, pending before the
Court of Addl. CJM, Kotdwar, Pauri Garhwal are
hereby quashed qua the present applicant also.
(R.C. Khulbe, J.)
10.12.2019
Rdang