Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 2154
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Vivek Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
WPMS/862/2026
Important Points
Subject
Civil - Excise
Headnote
Issues: Whether the order to relocate the liquor sub-shop at Lolti was legally sustainable.
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Chetan Joshi
For the Respondents: Suyash Pant, Sandeep Kothari
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
| S N L o . . |
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
(2) Petitioner has challenged the order dated 31.3.2026, passed by Commissioner, Excise, Uttarakhand in an appeal filed by respondent no. 5. In that appeal, respondent no. 5 had questioned opening of liquor sub-shop at Lolti, District Chamoli by the petitioner on the ground that due to said sub-shop, business of his liquor shop is adversely affected; liquor shop of respondent no. 5 is situate at Tharali, which is only six kilometres from Lolti, while the main liquor shop allotted to petitioner at Gwaldam is 24 kilometres away from Lolti.
(3) Appeal filed by respondent no. 5 was allowed by Commissioner, Excise by holding that since revenue of liquor shop of respondent no. 5 is adversely affected, therefore, the sub-shop opened by the petitioner at Lolti shall be relocated to some other place near Gwaldam, where petitioner
[[IMG_1]] [[IMG_2]]
