2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 2158
UKHC010110202026
BA1/1111/2026
Tanveer --Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.Date or COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures
1. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, leaned AGA for the State.
3. The instant first bail application has been moved by the applicant “Tanveer, son of Anwar” praying for regular bail in reference to FIR dated 03.05.2026 bearing FIR No. 0181 of 2025, Police Station – Bahadrabad, District – Haridwar lodged by Jal Singh implicating the present applicant and one Nazim for the offences punishable under Section 64 (2) (e) & (f), 70 (1) BNS, 2023 read with Section 5 (l) (n) / 6 of the POCSO Act. In this FIR, investigation was concluded and the applicant and other co-accused Nazim have been charge-sheeted for the offences for the offences punishable under Section 351 (3), 64 (2) (e) (f), 70 (1) BNS, 2023 read with Section 5 (l) (n) / 6 of the POCSO Act, 3 (2) (v) of the SC / ST Act and under Section 5 of the Freedom of Religion Act.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated, which is evident from the fact that victim during her cross examination before the trial court does not support the prosecution case and denied the allegations and the relationship, if