SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(UT) 2386

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Sri Vipin Sanghi, CJ, Sri Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Sukhivender Kaur Gill – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
Special Appeal No. 466 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. Girish Chandra Lakhchaura, Mr. Aayush Gaur
For the Respondents: Mr. B.S. Parihar, Mr. Ravi Bisht

State law regulating plastic waste management prevails over lower GSM central guidelines; state can enforce stricter environmental regulations.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Uttarakhand Plastic and Other Non-Biodegradable Garbage (Regulation of Use and Disposal) Act, 2013 - Imposition of fine under the State Act for manufacturing non-woven bags - The Court affirmed the State’s legislative competence to regulate environmental matters; it upheld the State ban on low GSM bags despite central regulations allowing higher GSM. (Paras 4, 28, 30)

(B) Legislative Competence - The court found no conflict between the State and Central legislations concerning environmental protections, emphasizing the jurisdiction of the State to act more stringently in areas of local governance and public health. (Paras 11, 29)

Facts of the case:
The appellant challenged a fine of Rs. 5,00,000 for manufacturing non-woven plastic bags under the State Pollution Control Board's order, arguing it was permissible under central regulations allowing 60 GSM bags.

Findings of Court:
The State legislation was deemed valid, upholding a stricter regulatory framework aimed at preserving local ecological integrity.

Issues: The court addressed whether the prohibition of certain plastics under State legislation was repugnant to Central rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court concluded that the Environment (Protection) Act does not invalidate state measures that impose stricter norms; local legislation prevails when aimed at public health and safety.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to fine imposed for plastic manufacturing. (Para 1 , 2)
2. legal grounds cited for the appellant's defense. (Para 3 , 4)
3. discussion on legislative competence and environmental law. (Para 5 , 11 , 12 , 14)
4. clarification on the legality and harmonization of state and central laws. (Para 30)
5. court's final ruling and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 32)

JUDGMENT :

(per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)

The present Special Appeal is directed against the order dated 09.12.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3142 of 2022 (M/S) preferred by the appellant. The learned Single Judge has dismissed the said writ petition, wherein the appellant had challenged the order dated 26.03.2022 issued by the State Pollution Control Board, imposing a fine of Rs. 5,00,000/- on the appellant, and the recovery citation dated 09.11.2022 issued by respondent no. 5, to effect recovery of the said fine.

2. The case of the appellant was that he is running a small scale industry, which is manufacturing non woven fabric (plastic carry bags). For the manufacture of the said product, the appellant purchases raw material in clippers form, and the thickness of the non woven fabric is 60 GSM. The respondent no. 4 conducted inspection of the premises of the appellant on 26.03.2022, and since the appellant was found to be conducting its business activities in contravention of the Uttarakhand Plastic and Other Non Biodegradable Garbage (Regulation of Use and Disposal) Act, 2013, and the order dated 14.10.2021 issued thereunder, fine of Rs.5,00,000/- was imposed by the order dated 26.03.2022.

3. The appellant challenged the imposition of fine on the ground that the non woven fabric manufactured by the appellant being of 60 GSM, its manufacture was permissible under Section 4 (j) of the notification dated 12.08.2021 issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change. The said notification brought into force the Plastic Waste Management (Amendment) Rules, 2021 w.e.f. the date of publication i.e. 12.08.2021. Post amendment, Rule 4 of Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, insofar as, it is relevant, reads as follows:

“(1) The manufacture, importer stocking, distribution, sale and use of carry bags, plastic sheets or like, or cover made of plastic sheet and multilayered packaging, shall be subject to the following conditions, namely:-

“(j) non-woven plastic carry bag shall not be less than 60 Gram Per Square Meter (GSM) with effect from the 30th September, 2021.”

4. The case of the appellant was that since the Plastic Waste Management Rules, as amended in 2021, permitted the manufacture of non woven plastic carry bags - of not less than 60 GSM, the complete ban imposed by the State Act i.e. Uttarakhand Plastic and Other Non Biodegradable Garbage (Regulation of Use and Disposal) Act, 2013, (The Act of 2013), and the order dated 14.10.2020 issued under Section 3 of the Act of 2013, is illegal. According to the appellant, there is repugnancy in the Environment (Protection) Act, and the Rules framed by the Central Government under that Act on the one hand, and the aforesaid Act of 2013 framed by the State Legislature, and the order dated 14.10.2020 issued thereunder, and, consequently, the Central Legislation and the Rules framed thereunder would prevail, over the State enactment, and the order issued thereunder, as aforesaid.

5. Learned Single Judge has, however, not found favour with the said submission and has dismissed the writ petition. Consequently, this Appeal has been preferred. 6. Section 3 of the Act of 2013 reads as under:-

“3. Restriction or prohibition on use of certain things manufactured from non- biodegradable material. -

(1) The State Government may, by notification, impose restriction or prohibition on the manufacture, sale, purchase, storage, distribution and use of any plastic or other non-biodegradable material within the State of Uttarakhand, which is contrary to the norms as the State Government may, by not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top