Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J
Ankit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to criminal proceedings (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. authority of constables to make arrests (Para 3 , 4 , 18 , 21 , 26) |
| 3. definition and scope of a 'police officer' (Para 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 23) |
| 4. court's conclusion on arrest authority and dismissal (Para 6 , 27) |
JUDGEMENT
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
The applicant to the present C-482 Application has put a challenge to the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 8059 of 2018, State Vs. Ankit Kumar, which stood registered as a consequence of the culmination of the investigation being conducted by the Investigating Officer, into the set of allegations levelled in FIR, being FIR No. 557 st of 2018, dated 21 September, 2018, which was registered by Constable 49 T.P. Dinesh Kapari, for the alleged involvement of the present applicant for commission of the offence under Sections 332 and 353 of the IPC.
2. Consequence to the submission of the chargesheet, the cognizance has been taken by virtue of an th order dated 15 December, 2018, as it has been passed by the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, in the aforesaid Criminal Case No. 8059 of 2018, State Vs. Ankit Kumar.
3. There
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
