SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(UT) 1618

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma
RAJ KUMAR GIRI ALIAS RAJU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


SL.

No

Date

Office Notes, reports,

orders or proceedings or

directions and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

C-482 No. 943 of 2022

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the

applicants.

Mr. T.C. Agarwal, A.G.A. for the State.

The grievance of the applicant is as against

the summoning order dated 05.10.2021, whereby,

he has been summoned to participate in the

proceedings of Criminal Case No. 420 of 2021,

State Vs. Raju and Others, wherein, he has been

summoned to be tried for the offences under

Sections 323, 354, 452, 506 of IPC, which has been

registered against him at Thana Bahadrabad,

District Haridwar.

The counsel for the applicant without

venturing to address the Court on 482 application

on its own merits submits, that since all the

offences carry a sentence of less than seven years,

they would be governed by the parameters of the

judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court as rendered in

Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of

Investigation, as reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773.

Since, all the offences will fall into A

category of offences, as it has been clas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top