HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHD. SHADAB – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
1. Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the applicants.
2. By the instant criminal miscellaneous application preferred under Section 528 of Cr.P.C . the applicants are challenging the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 63 of 2024 ‘Vineeta Saini vs. Dilip Saini and others’ pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate/3rd Additional Civil Judge, Haridwar, wherein, by the order dated 18.03.2024, all the applicants have been summoned for the offence punishable under Section 495 of IPC . The another accused person Dilip Saini, who is the husband of the complainant has also been summoned for the offence punishable under Section 494 of IPC ; however, the husband Dilip Saini is not before this Court.
3. The son of applicant no. 1-Dilip Saini married with the respondent/complainant on 16.01.2013, but due to differences that there was a repeated demand of dowry the complainant was harassed by her husband and the family members and the respondent/ complainant left the matrimonial house in the year 2017 and since then they are living separately.
4. Subsequently, the complaint was filed by the respondent/complainant against her husband and in-laws and other family memb
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.