SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(UT) 926

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHD. SHADAB – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the applicants.

2. By the instant criminal miscellaneous application preferred under Section 528 of Cr.P.C . the applicants are challenging the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 63 of 2024 ‘Vineeta Saini vs. Dilip Saini and others’ pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate/3rd Additional Civil Judge, Haridwar, wherein, by the order dated 18.03.2024, all the applicants have been summoned for the offence punishable under Section 495 of IPC . The another accused person Dilip Saini, who is the husband of the complainant has also been summoned for the offence punishable under Section 494 of IPC ; however, the husband Dilip Saini is not before this Court.

3. The son of applicant no. 1-Dilip Saini married with the respondent/complainant on 16.01.2013, but due to differences that there was a repeated demand of dowry the complainant was harassed by her husband and the family members and the respondent/ complainant left the matrimonial house in the year 2017 and since then they are living separately.

4. Subsequently, the complaint was filed by the respondent/complainant against her husband and in-laws and other family memb

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top