HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Ravindra Maithani, J
Smt. Asha Solanki and another – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and another – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The challenge in this petition is made to the charge dated 10.10.2017 passed in Sessions Trial No. 79 of 2017, State vs. Asha Solanki and another, by the court of Sessions Judge, Dehradun (“the case”). By it, the petitioners have been charged for the offence under Section 306 /34 IPC .
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. The factual matrix is in a very short compass. The deceased Nikita was a student of Class VIII. On 09.03.2016, she was writing her examination. According to the FIR, in the school, the petitioners, who were teachers in the school did maar peet with her and harassed her. The deceased after returning from the examination hall revealed it to her mother that due to beating up by the petitioners, she could not write well in the examination. Subsequently, she committed suicide. The FIR records that the CCTV footages revealed that the petitioners were beating up to the deceased. According to the FIR, it was the petitioners, who abetted the deceased to commit suicide. The FIR of the incident was given by the father of the deceased on 10.03.2016, based on which, an investigation was carried out and c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.