Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Krishan Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Narayan Dutt Mishra& another – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for cross-examination by tenant. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. tenant's right to challenge witnesses. (Para 3) |
| 3. summary proceedings and evidence via affidavits. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. prescribed authority's discretion in cross-examination. (Para 7) |
| 5. writ petition's dismissal and court's non-interference. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is tenant in respect of a building situate at Jwalapur, District Haridwar. Respondents sought release of the said building under Section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (for short ‘Act No. 13 of 1972”), by moving an application before Prescribed Authority.
2. Petitioner filed objection/written statement to the release application. He also filed an application under Section 34 (a) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972, seeking permission to cross-examine the landlords and their witnesses. In the said application, petitioner contended that the landlords have suppressed the information about their immovable property and also one clinic owned by respondent no. 1, at Lucknow. It was further contended that since the building in question is very old, therefore, substantial amount of money would be needed f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
