SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(UT) 446

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
M/S SHANTIRAM AGRO INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME AT DEHRADUN – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

ON THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023

BEFORE:

HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI

WRIT PETITION (M/S) No. 1125 of 2023

BETWEEN:

M/S Shantiram

Agro Industries & others.

…….Petitioners

(By Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Advocate)

AND:

State of Uttarakhand & others.

….Respondents

(Mr. Vinod Nautiyal, Deputy Advocate General for the State of

Uttarakhand/respondent nos. 1 & 2 and Mr. Siddhartha Jain,

Advocate for respondent no. 4)

JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Petitioners took different loans from Punjab

National Bank Branch Kashipur, on different dates.

Since petitioners could not repay the loan in time,

therefore, recovery proceedings have been initiated

against them, by invoking provisions of Securitisation

and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement

of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short ‘SARFAESI Act,

2002’).

3.

In

this

writ

petition,

petitioners

have

challenged an order passed by District Magistrate,

Udham Singh Nagar in exercise of power under Section

14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

2

4.

It is contended on behalf of pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top