SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(UT) 2337

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipin Sanghi,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
AJAY KUMAR VERMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE, – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAINITAL

THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI VIPIN SANGHI

AND

JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI

SPECIAL APPEAL No.182 OF 2021

05TH JANUARY, 2023

Ajay Kumar Verma & another

…… Appellants

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others …… Respondents

Presence: -

Shri Anand Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the

appellants.

Shri J.C. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

Shri Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no. 3.

JUDGMENT: (Per Shri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)

The present Special Appeal is directed against

the judgment dated 05.05.2021, rendered by the learned

Single Judge in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 977 of 2021. The

appellant preferred the said writ petition to seek direction

to the respondents to award him compensation, in respect

of his alleged land, which the respondent-State allegedly

took over without due process of law, for construction of a

road.

2.

The learned Single Judge noticed that according

to the writ petitioner, his land was allegedly taken over

way back in the year 1990 for construction of road called

Tirathpur, Dhanpur Motor Road.

3.

The writ petition itself was preferred 31

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top