SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(UT) 264

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma
FAIZ ALAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders or

proceedings or

directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

IA No.2/2023 (Compounding Application)

In

C482 No. 134 of 2023

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

Mr. Deep Prakash Bhatt, Advocate

for the applicant.

Mrs. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder for

the State.

Mr.

Ajay

Joshi,

Advocate

for

respondent no. 2.

The applicant and the complainant-

respondent no. 2 are present in-person,

who were being duly identified by their

respective counsels.

The

challenge

by

the

present

applicant, though, who is not the named

accused person in the FIR, and whose

name has only figured during the course

of

investigation,

as

reflected

in

the

Charge-sheet No. 43 of 2022 dated

15.07.2022, as submitted against him for

his alleged involvement in the commission

of offence under Section 420 of IPC and

Section 66D of the Information Technology

Act, 2008.

On submission of the charge-sheet,

and the consequential summoning order

dated 14.09.2022 has been issued by the

Judicial Magistrate, Tanakpur, District

Champawat in Criminal Case No. 381 of

2022, “State vs. Faiz Alam”.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top