SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UT) 242

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SUMITRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Alok Kumar, Mr. J. S. Virk, Mr. Rakesh Joshi

JUDGMENT: (per Mr. G. Narendar C.J.

On 06.03.2025, this Court had passed the following order:-

“The petitioner is a lady aged about 65 years i.e. a senior citizen and is before this Court praying for protection from the third respondent; that, the petitioner is a person, who would be entitled to the benefits accruing under the Senior Citizens Act.

4. In that view of the matter, we direct the S.D.M. Roorkee, District Haridwar to enquire with the petitioner and the third respondent and warn respondent nos.4 to 7 of consequences. If the allegations of harassment and threat to life and personal liberty of the petitioner are proved. S.D.M. Roorkee, District Haridwar shall submit a report to this Court.

5. Put up on 17.03.2025.

6. The SDM, Roorkee shall positively submit his report by then.

7. A copy of this order be forwarded to S.D.M. Roorkee by email and a free copy of this order be furnished to Deputy Advocate General for the State.”

2. Today, the learned Deputy Advocate General for the State would submit a report by the Sub-District Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar. The report reads as under:-

“The inquiry committee today on 15.03.2025 took the statements of the petitioner Smt. Sumitr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top