2023 Supreme(Online)(UT) 37
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HEMU YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPCRL 86/2023
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports,
orders or
proceedings
or directions
and
Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL No. 86 of 2023
Hon’ble S.K. Mishra, J.
Mr. Siddhartha Sah, learned counsel for the
petitioner.
Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, learned A.G.A.
for the State.
By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has
prayed for the following reliefs:
1. “Issue a writ, order or direction in the
nature of certiorari to quash the FIR No.
4/2023, Police Station, Kichha, District
U.S Nagar under Sections 323, 384, 504
& 506 of IPC.
2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the
nature of mandamus commanding the
respondent nos. 1 & 2 not to arrest the
petitioner in FIR No. 4/2023, Police
Station Kichha, District U.S. Nagar under
Sections 323, 384, 504 & 506 IPC”
The contents of the FIR reveal a prima-facie
case under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of IPC.
However, the offence under Section 384 of the
IPC is not made out. The offence under Section
385 of IPC is made out.
In that view of the matter, though, this Court
is not inclined to quash the FIR, gives direction to
the Investigating Officer to act accordingly by
deleting the offence under Section 384 of IPC and
substituting the offence under Section 385 of IPC
in the scope of investigation.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would
further submit that since none of the offences
allegedly punishable in terms of imprisonment
exceeding 7 years, the appropriate direction be
given to follow the provisions of Section 341A of
the Code.
Learned State counsel would submit that
once there is an order passed by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar’s case, which
has been subsequently followed in the case of
Satendra Kumar Antil vs. CBI and Another
reported in 2022 SCC Online 825, there is no
need to pass repeated directions in each case.
We hope and trust that the submission made
by the learned A.G.A. is followed by the police.
Any violation of the order passed by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar’s case shall be
viewed very seriously by this Court.
There is no need to pass any further order.
WPCRL is disposed of.
(S.K. Mishra, J.)
12.01.2023
(Grant urgent certified copy as per Rules)
Pooja