HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Ritu Bahri, CJ, Rakesh Thapliyal, J
BABU RAM KASHYAP – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK ERSTWHILE SYNDICATE BANK – Respondent
“Final Order”
In view of the above mentioned legal points, I am of considered opinion that the appellant Sh. Babu Ram Kashyap is entitled to receive total gratuity of 15,22,042/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakh Twenty Two Thousand & Forty Two Only) as the higher amount of gratuity as per the service Regulations of the bank. As the applicant has already received Rs. 11,87,100/-, he need to be paid further amount of gratuity equivalent to Rs. 3,34,942/- (Rupees Three Lakh Thirty Four Thousand Thirty & Nine Hundred & Forty Two Only), by the Respondent (The General Manager, Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal) within 30 days from receipt of this order along with simple interest @ 7% p.a. from 12.10.2014.”
7. With respect to length of service, the gratuity was calculated for a period of three years beyond 30 years i.e. till 33 years. The petitioner, in the present case, has put in service of 36 years, three months and twelve days. The petitioner is also aggrieved that the benefit of six of years of service beyond thirty years has been wrongly denied.
8. The petitioner was communicated the claim order vide order dated 28th February, 2020 (Annexure PA-2). Against the order dated 28.02.2020, the petiti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.