SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(UT) 1447

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NEERAJ SINGH ADHIKARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

C482 Application No. 2101 of 2023

Neeraj Singh Adhikari

… Applicant

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and Another

… Respondents

Advocate:

Mr. Vinoda Nand Barthwal, Advocate, for the applicant through

video conferencing

Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, AGA, for the State

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

A very peculiar argument has been raised by the

learned counsel for the applicant while putting a challenge

to the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1847 of 2023,

Jeevan Vs. Neeraj Singh Adhikari, being the complaint

proceedings drawn for the offences under Sections 504 and

506 of IPC.

2.

Firstly, the learned counsel for the applicant has

argued the matter that the complainant has not approached

the Court with clean hands for the reason being that much

prior to the registration of the complaint under Section

156(3) of CrPC on 04.03.2023, since the complainant has

not disclosed the fact about the proceedings under Section

107 to be read with Section 116 of CrPC, it will amount that

the respondent complainant had not approached the Court

with clean hands.

3.

Secondly, he argues that the compl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top