JUDGEMENT

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Since common questions of facts and law are involved in these writ petitions, therefore, these are being heard and decided together by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of Writ Petition (S/B) No. 235 of 2021 alone are being considered and discussed. Petitioner Dr.

Gaurav Upadhyay has filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:

“I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus, commanding the Respondents to insure that a Sustainability Plan is formulated for the TEQIP III Phase faculty, currently teaching at Institute of Technology, Gopeshwar, in accordance with the directives of the Government of India and the State of Uttarakhand.

II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the respondents to ensure fair and transparent selection process, by which high performing faculty can be identified in the interest of student of the Institute of Technology, Gopeshwar.

III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the advertisement dated 15.2.2021 as being arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to law.”

(2) According to petitioner, he was appointed in Institute of Technology, Gopeshwar in the year 2018 under Technical Education Quality Implementation Programme, introduced by Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Higher Education with the help of World Bank. In the appointment order itself, it was mentioned that petitioner’s appointment shall stand terminated on stipulated date (31.3.2020) and/or shall be co-terminus with the project, whichever is earlier. According to petitioner, the term of the project was extended up to 31st March, 2022.

Apprehending termination of his service, petitioner has filed this writ petition. A coordinate Bench of this Court passed an interim order in favour of petitioner in Writ Petition (S/B) No. 235 of 2021 alone, on the strength of which petitioner is said to be continuing in service.

(3) In sum and substance, petitioner wants a sustainability plan to be formulated for implementation of TEQIP-III Phase so that his employment with Institute of Technology, Gopeshwar is continued unhindered.

(4) Mr. Siddhartha Sah and Mr.

Bhupesh Kandpal, learned Counsel appearing for the Institute of Technology, relied upon a judgment rendered by Hon’ble Delhi High Court in W.P. (C) 9647/2020 and other connected writ petitions for contending that similarly situate persons appointed as faculty under TEQIP Project had approached Delhi High Court claiming various reliefs, however, their writ petitions were dismissed. Para 21 to 25 of Delhi High Court judgment are reproduced below:

”21. There is no dispute that the petitioners' appointment was with regard to a project (TEQIP-Ill) started on the basis of the funding made by the World Bank. The purpose of the Project is very clear to improve the technical education in the country and the same is to be achieved by appointing faculties in different Govt. / Govt. funded institutes. The terms of appointment of the petitioners are very clear that the same is temporary for a period of three years. It is the case of the respondent No. 1 that the World Bank has decided not to fund the Project beyond March 31, 2021 and pursuant thereto the Project Unit shall be disbanded. In other words, the Project for which the petitioners are working would no more exist. The very basis of employment of the petitioners shall cease to exist. If that be so, the appointment of the petitioners shall also be discontinued. The petitioners being Project employees, cannot continue beyond the project life, i.e., March 31, 2021. The plea of Mr. Mehta is that the posts being in existence, the petitioners need to be continued. I am not in agreement with the s