SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

COURT No.2 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI 26. OA 2822/2023 Brig VJ.S. Birdi vaiesa Applicant VERSUS Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. S.S.Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Rajan Khosla, Advocate CORAM HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA, MEMBER (J) HON’BLE REAR ADMIRAL DHIREN VIG, MEMBER (A) ORDER 20.09.2023 The present OA has been filed under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 by the applicant being aggrieved by the incorrect pay-fixation of his pay in the 6' Central Pay Commission (CPC) resulting in continuous financial loss and disadvantage. The applicant has made the following prayers: “(a) Call for the records wherein the respondents have fixed the pay of the applicant in the 6% CPC in the Rank of Maj w.e.f 01.01.2006 and thereafter despite repeated directions, the respondents have not rectified the fixation of the pay of the applicant in the Rank of Lt.Col. which was more beneticial to him at the time of his transition from 5* to 6% CPC and thereafter quash the same. (b) Issue further direction to the respondents to re-fix the pay of the applicant in the 6% CPC from the date of promotion as Lt. Col on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top