SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (Through Virtual Hearing) 2. OA 89/2022 Brig Anurag Khanna (Retd.) ... Applicant Versus Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents For Applicant : Shri Rajiv Manglik, Advocate For Respondents: Gp Capt K S Bhati, Sr. CGSC CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA, MEMBER (J) HON’BLE VICE ADMIRAL P. MURUGESAN, MEMBER (A) ORDER 03.02.2022 Vide separate order OA stands disposed off with the observation that the applicant may take all the legal pleas available to him before the Court Martial. Learned counsel for the applicant makes an oral prayer for grant of leave to appeal which is opposed by learned senior counsel for the respondents. We do not find any substantial question of law of public importance involved in the matter which warrants grant of leave to appeal. As such, oral prayer is declined. [JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA] MEMBER (J) [VICE ADMIRAL P. MURUGESAN] MEMBER (A) /sm/ap/COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) O.A. NO. 89 OF 2022 MR - 05143K Brig Anurag Khanna, VSM (Retd) .. Applicant Versus Union of India &Ors. ..Respondents For the Applicant:- Mr.RajivManglik,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top