COURT No.1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI 3. OA 976/2020 Cadet Tanudeep Kaur sees Applicant VERSUS Union of India and Ors. ..... Respondents For Applicant : Ms. K. Ramesh, Advocate For Respondents: Mr. H. V. Shankar, Advocate CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA MENON, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE LT GEN P.M. HARIZ, MEMBER (A) ORDER 20.04.2022 Vide our detailed order of even date, we have dismissed the main OA No.976/2020. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the applicant makes an oral prayer for grant of leave for impugning the order of the Tribunal to the Hon’ble Supreme Court in terms of Section 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant and going through our order, in our considered view, there appears to be no point of law much less any point of law of general public importance involved in the order, therefore prayer for grant of leave to appeal stands declined. ~~ ~ —_-~+ - 7 C—- (RAJENDRA MENON) CHAIRPERSON —— (P.M. HARIZ) MEMBER (A) /vks/jyotiCOURT NO. 1, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. No. 976 of 2020 In the matter of: Cadet Tanudeep Kaur ... Applicant Versus Union o