SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 3272

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
R.K. AGRAWAL, VIKRAM NATH, JJ.
AMITY BUSINESS SCHOOL & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION DELHI – Respondent
Spl. Appeal 843 of 2006



The AICTE must ensure fairness and transparency in its decision-making process, particularly when withdrawing approval from educational institutions.

Headnote:(A) All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10 and 11 - Withdrawal of approval for technical courses - The AICTE's decision to withdraw approval based on alleged deficiencies was challenged - The court found that the AICTE did not consider the appellants' full submissions and failed to provide adequate reasoning for its actions - The court directed AICTE to reconsider the matter in light of the observations made. (Paras 70-75)

(B) Natural Justice - The principle of natural justice was discussed in relation to the AICTE's failure to provide the inspection report to the appellants prior to the withdrawal of approval - The court emphasized the need for transparency and fairness in administrative actions. (Paras 74-75)

Facts of the case:
The appellants challenged the AICTE's decision to withdraw approval for their PGDM courses, citing procedural irregularities and lack of proper consideration of their compliance submissions.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the AICTE's actions were arbitrary and lacked sufficient justification, ordering a fresh review of the appellants' compliance with regulations.

Issues: The main issues included whether the AICTE's withdrawal of approval was justified and whether the principles of natural justice were upheld in the process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the AICTE must act within the bounds of fairness and transparency, ensuring that all relevant materials are considered before making decisions affecting educational institutions.

Result: The judgments and order of the learned Single Judge are set aside, and the AICTE is directed to reconsider the matter.

Table of Content
1. consideration of submissions (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
2. fairness and transparency (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76)

Judgment
 R.K. AGRAWAL, J.
Amity Business School, Noida and Ritnand Balved Education Foundation, New Delhi, have preferred this special appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of Court, 1952 against the judgment and order dated 23-12-2005 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the writ petition, being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 65741 of 2005, filed by the aforementioned two persons, has been dismissed with certain observations.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follow:
Ritnand Balved Education Foundation, appellant No. 2, (hereinafter referred to as “the Society”) is a Society registered under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, with its registered office situate at E-27, Defence Colony, New Delhi. Its aims and objects, inter alia, are to establish educational institution of all descriptions including public school, management training institution, colleges carrying out research in all aspect of education including applied science. It has established an institution in the name and style of Amity Business School (hereinafter referred to as “the Institution”) at Sector 44, Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar (U.P.), appellant No. 1. The Society runs various educational institutions by the name of AMITY. According to it, at present it has more than 40,000 students, 130 programmes and 22 campus all over India. It is also offering various graduate and postgraduate professional technical career decrees. It claims to be dedicated for the last more than 5 years in building the nation through world class education. It offers varied courses in engineering, bio-technology, computer science, information technology, nano-technology, medical science, research, management courses, communication, design, fashion technology, law and a number of international courses. Some of its institutes, as is being claimed, have been ranked as number one private institution in the country, namely, the Amity School of Bio Technology and the Amity School of Engineering and Technology. It has also established the Amity University, U.P. pursuant to an Act passed in the year 2005 by the legislature of the State of U.P. According to them, the Institution which has been established in the year 1994, is an autonomous institution. It does not receive any government grant/aid. It is a private unaided institution and imparts only two programmes, viz., Post Graduate Diploma in Management (Full Time) and (Part Time)(hereinafter referred to as “the PGDM(FT)” and “the PGDM(PT)”). To that extent, aforesaid programmes which require approval of the All India Council for Technical Education (hereinafter referred to as “the Aicte”) had been approved by the Aicte on 16-12-1994 with annual intake of 120 and 60 students, respectively. The renewal has been continuously granted by the Aicte. The intake of students in PGDM(FT) has been increased to 150 students. The Association of Indian Universities has also recognised the PGDM course run by the institution as equivalent to MBA. The Aicte granted extension of approval to the Institution on 14-5-2004 for the period 2004-2006. It claims to have been ranked at No. 8 in the whole country amongst top business schools in terms of availability of infrastructure and in the past 10 years, its students have been placed in top multinationals and the Indian Companies of repute. It is accredited with ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001:1996. The Institution is an independent entity having separate building, infrastructure for the two Aicte approved c







































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top