SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(APTEL) 77

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY
Timarpur-Okhla Waste Management. – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission & Anr . – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

PER HON’BLE JUSTICE SURENDRA KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. The Appeal No. 251 of 2013 under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has been preferred by Timarpur-Okhla Waste Management Company Limited (in short, the ‘Appellant’), challenging only a part of the tariff Order, dated 31.7.2013, passed by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (in short, the ‘State Commission)/Respondent No.1 herein, in Petition No. 1 of 2013, whereby the State Commission has while conducting the True-up for FY 2011-12, Review and Provisional True-up for FY 2012-13 and approving the Annual Revenue Requirement of the Respondent No.2 (BSES Rajdhani Power Limited)/Distribution Licensee for its Distribution (Wheeling and Retail Supply) business for FY 2013-14 has allowed the Respondent No.2 to fulfill part of its Renewable Purchase Obligation (RPO) by purchasing 50 MU power from the Appellant at Rs. 2.60 per unit. The Appellant is the Power Generating Company, Respondent No.1/DERC is the State Regulatory Commission and Respondent No.2/BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. is the Distribution Licensees (hereinafter referred to as ‘BRPL’).

2. The Appeal No. 325 of 2013 under Section 111 of the Electricit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top