SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(APTEL) 106

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY
M/s. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors. – Respondent


O R D E R

PER HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M. KARPAGA VINAYAGAM CHAIRPERSON

1. This is the Application to condone the delay of 83 days in refiling of the Appeal against the impugned order.

2. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission invoking the jurisdiction u/s 142 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has passed the impugned order imposing a penalty of Rs.20,000/- on Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited, the Appellant for violation of its Regulations.

3. As against this order, the Appellant has filed this Appeal.

But, defect notice was sent to the Registry asking the Appellant to cure the defects and to refile the Appeal within the time frame. But, there was some delay in re-filing of the Appeal. Hence, this Application has been filed to condone the said delay by offering some explanation. Hence, this Tribunal has to consider whether the said delay in Refiling can be condoned in the light of the explanation given by the Applicant.

4. The impugned order which has been challenged in this Appeal was passed by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission on 12.11.2012 imposing penalty of Rs.20,000/- for violation of its Regulation on the Applicant. As against this order, the Applicant/Appellant filed the A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top