APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
Shri Bharat Bhushan Swain – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bhubaneswar – Respondent
FPA-PMLA-2003/BBS/2017
FPA-PMLA-2003/BBS/2017
Page 1 of 10
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT
AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision : 13.02.2019
FPA-PMLA-2003/BBS/2017
Shri Bharat Bhushan Swain
… Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Bhubaneswar
…
Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant
:
Mr. Rahul Shyam Bhandari, Advocate
Mr. Saswat Kumar Acharya, Advocate
For the Respondent
:
Mr. Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
:
CHAIRMAN
SHRI G. C. MISHRA
:
MEMBER
JUDGMENT
FPA-PMLA-2003/BBS/2017
The present appeal has been preferred by Sh. Bharat Bhusan
Swain, the appellant against the order passed by Adjudicating Authority
in Original Complaint (O.C.) No. 733/2017 dated 01.09.2017 in
Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) 11/2017 dated 29.03.2017 arising
out of ECIR/02/BBSZO/2016 dated 03.06.2016. The appellant is
Defendant no.4 in the O. C.
2.
The appellant has prayed for setting aside the order dated
01.09.2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority and passed any of
other(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the fact and circumstances
of the case.
FPA-PMLA-2003/BBS/2017
Page 2 of 10
3.
As it reveals from the record that the present appellant, a special
class contractor undertaking various govt. projects alleged to have been
involved in many criminal activities including attempt to murder,
extortion (“dada-bati”), tender fixing, offences under Arms Act, etc. for
which five FIRs lodged against him and others by Chauliaganj Police
Station, Cuttack, Odisha since the year 1982 and was lodged in Jail
under Judicial custody. In the present case He was again arrested in
March 2016 for the extortion, tender fixing and offences under Arms Act,
under 1959 was sent to Judicial custody for 7 months till 20th October,
2016 on the basis of FIR lodged by Sh. Saroj Dehury at the aforesaid
police station.
4.
The O.C. no. 733/2017 was filed against 10 defendants including
the present appellant who has been arrayed as defendant no. 4 as these
defendants alleged to have committed offences u/s 120B, 302, 307,
364(A), 384, 386, 387, 411, 419, 420, 471, 489(B) of IPC and sections 25
and 27 of Arms Act, 1959. As these offences are scheduled offences
under paragraphs 1 & 5 respectively of schedule under PMLA and that as
prima facie case of offence of money laundering under section 3 of PML
Act, 2002 and punishable under section 4 of PMLA, 2002, so the
Enforcement
Directorate
registered
ECIR/BBSZO/02/2016
dated
03.06.2016 and that the case was taken up for the investigation. During
the course of investigation statement of various persons including the
appellant u/s 50 of PMLA, 2002 have been recorded. The statement of
the present appellant has also been recorded.
5.
It is seen from the handwritten copy of the seizure list dated
01.02.2016 that an amount of Rs. 12,44,000/- cash seized from the
FPA-PMLA-2003/BBS/2017
Page 3 of 10
house of the appellant by the local police on 01.02.2016 during the
course of investigation in Chauliaganj PS case no. 12 dated 30.01.2014
registered u/s 341/323/326/506/34 IPC r/w section 25/27 of Arms Act,
1959 turned to 341/323/326/307/506/34 of IPC r/w Section 25 and
27 of Arms Act, 1959.
6.
It is also seen from the record that a plain paper FIR was drawn by
Sh. Ajay Kumar Das, IIC, Chauliaganj PS, Police Commissionrate,
Bhubansewar on 03.02.2016 at 2pm. In the said plain paper FIR the fact
of involvement of the present appellant in extortion etc. and the seizure
of Rs. 12,44,000/- have been reflected. Consequent thereto a regular
case was registered vide PS case no. 27/16 u/s 387/120B/34 IPC r/w
25(1-AA)/ 27 of Arms Act against the present appellant and others.
Thus, Rs. 12,44,000/- has been made as a proceeds of crime under this
PS case no. 27/16.
7.
It is also revealed from the record that charge sheets in PS c