HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
SURESH KOTHARI – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SUBHADRA BAI (Died and Deleted) – Respondent
CAV Judgment
1. The plaintiff/appellant has challenged the judgment and decree passed by the learned IVth Additional District Judge, Durg (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 1234766-A/2010 dated 17.10.2017, whereby the Civil Suit preferred by the plaintiff was dismissed.
2. Vide order dated 19.02.2024, an application under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC (I.A. NO. 6 of 2024) regarding the amendment in the plaint with respect to refund of the earnest amount/advance money sought by the plaintiff/appellant was allowed by this Court and the plaintiff/appellant was permitted to carry out the necessary amendment in the plaint within a period of 7 days. The aforesaid relief was sought by the plaintiff/appellant in light of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Desh Raj v. Rohtash Singh, (2023) 7 SCC 714.
3. The facts of the present case are that the appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the contract inter alia on the ground that an agreement was entered into between the plaintiff/appellant and Subhadra Bai on 23.01.2006 vide Ex.-P/1 wherein Subhadra Bai/original defendant No. 1 had agreed to sell the suit house i.e. HIG No. 37 situated at Housing Board
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.