Back
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Station House Officer, Police Station Urla, District Raipur (CG) – Appellant
Versus
Raghavpal @ Murli @ Dadu S/o Satrughan Pal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecutrix's missing case and recovery. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. trial court's examination and acquittal reasoning. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's evaluation of the trial court’s findings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 5 .4
.2024 1. Heard Mr.Pankaj Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the applicant on I.A.No.01 of 2024, which is an application for condonation of delay of 269 days in filing the appeal.
2. On due consideration, I.A.No.01 of 2024 is allowed. Delay is condoned.
3. The State has sought leave to appeal against the impugned judgment of acquittal dated 16.03.2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Second (POCSO) Fast Track Special Court, Raipur in Special Sessions Case No.95/2021, whereby the respondent / accused has been acquitted from charges under Sections 363 , 366, 376 (2)(n) of the IPC and Sections 5L/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 .
4. The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 6.4.2021 father of the prosecurtrix lodged a written complaint at Urla Police Station stating inter-alia that his daughter had left the house in between 12 to 1 at night on 6.4.2021 without informing anyone and did not
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
