Back
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Rajani Dubey, J
Vinod Kumar Lahre – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details regarding the petitioner's claims and the prosecution's story. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the legitimacy of the prosecution based on delayed fir. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. judicial approach towards quashing fir; established legal position. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. the court's decision regarding the dismissal of the petition. (Para 10 , 11) |
1. Heard Mr. Dheerendra Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent No.1.
2. The present petition under Section 482 of the CrPC has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :
3. The prosecution story according to the case diary, in brief, is that the complainant/prosecutrix has lodged the report before Police Station, Bhatapara Rural in which she has
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
