SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CG) 4029

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Sachin Singh Rajput
SURESH KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
SUKHRAM DHRUV – Respondent


Advocates:
Shri Shivendu Pandya, Advocate
For Respondent No.3:Shri B.N.Nande, Advocate

CAV Judgment

1.

Challenging the award dated 28/02/2018 passed by the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gariyaband (CG) in claim case No.14/2015, the appellants/claimants have filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘M.V.Act’) on account of death of their son Rajeev @ Raja Sharma in an accident that occurred on 19/12/2014 by rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle (Truck) bearing registration No.CG-04-J-2247 driven by respondent No.1, owned by respondent no.2 and insured with respondent No.3.

2.

As per claim application, the deceased was working as Finance and Retail Officer at Sonalika Tractors, Krishna Tractors in a truck and was earning Rs.12,000/- from his job and Rs.6,000/- as commission, total Rs.18,000/- per month, therefore, total compensation of Rs.48,40,000/- was claimed. The claim application was resisted by respondents 1 and 2 on various grounds and Respondent No.3 / insurance company took a plea that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the motor cycle by the deceased himself. The deceased and his friend were drunk. Therefore, the insurance company is not liable to pay compensation.

3.

On the b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top