1. The petitioners have filed present review petition seeking review of the judgment dated 3.11.2022 passed in W.P. (C) No.3156/2016 by which the writ petition has been allowed. 2. Petitioner/respondent No.1 herein approached the Division Bench of this Court by way of filing above writ petition praying for a declaration of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Audyogik Bhoomi Evam Bhawan Prabandhan Rules, 2015 as ultra vires being inconsistent with the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (henceforth ‘the Act of 2002’)

lause 3.4.2.11 would take precedence over the secured debt. The auction purchaser once participated in auction process and declared auction purchaser, cannot turn around and avoid liability to pay the statutory charges. In support of his contentions, he placed reliance on the decision of Hon’ble

Supreme Court in Central Bank of India vs. State of Kerala , reported in (2009) 4 SCC 94 . Since the aforementioned factual position and th