Appeal. No. 63 of 2019-DRAT-Kolkata
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 63 of 2019)
(Arising out of I.A. 148 of 2019 in S.A. No. 117 of 2018 in DRT -
Siliguri)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
1.
IDBI Bank Limited, a company incorporated and registered
under Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and a banking company
within the meaning of Section 5 (c) of the Banking Regulation
Act, 1949 (10 of 1949) and having its Registered office at IDBI
Tower, WTC Complex, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai – 400005 and
Branch Office at Gangtok, Sikkim.
2.
The Authorised Officer, IDBI Bank having his office at IDBI
House, 44, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata – 700017, under Police
Station- Shakespeare Sarani.
…Appellants
-Versus-
1.
Sri Bijendra Kumar Singh, son of Shri Ben Kumar Singh residing at Sai
Niwas, Upper Sichey Paljor Stadium, Sukhapool, Below PNGSSS,
Gangtok, Sikkim, Pin – 737101;
3.
Smt. Woeser Doma Bhutiya, wife of Sri Bijendra Kumar Singh,
residing at Sai Niwas, Upper Sichey Paljor Stadium, Sukhapool, Below
PNGSSS, Gangtok, Sikkim, Pin – 737101;
… Respondent
4.
Prashant Subedi, son of Sri S.B. Subedi, residing at Kyongza, near
Zilla Panchayat Bhawan, Gyalshing, West Sikkim, Sikkim, Pin -
737111
….Proforma Respondent
Counsel for the Appellants
Mr.
Debasish
Chakraborty,
Learned
Counsel, Ms. Sarmistha
Pal, Learned Counsel for
the Appellant
Counsel for Respondent
Mr.
Souritra
Ganguly,
Learned
Counsel
for
Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
Mr. B. P. Subba with Mr.
T.
Kumai,
Learned
Counsel
for
Proforma
Respondent No. 3.
2
Appeal. No. 63 of 2019-DRAT-Kolkata
JUDGMENT
:
On 14th March, 2023
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Instant Appeal has arisen against an order dated 10.07.2019
passed by Ld. DRT Siliguri in I.A. No. 148 of 2019 arising out of S.A. No.
117 of 2018 Bijendra Kr Singh and another versus IDBI Bank and another
whereby the Ld. DRT set aside the sale conducted on 30th March, 2019.
2.
As per the pleadings a mortgage loan of Rs.92,42,454/- was
sanctioned by the Appellant IDBI Bank to Respondent No. 1, Bijendra Kr.
Singh and further loan of Rs.50 lacs was disbursed. Respondent No. 1
created equitable mortgage of the immovable property lying and situated at
Upper Sichoy, Sai Niwas Gangtok, Khatiyan No. 273m Okit Bi,631/1324
Gangtok, East Sikkim with site area 3484.8 sq.ft. and 41/2 (four and half)
strd Building. Loan was not repaid. Accordingly, it was classified as NPA
on 10.04.2018. Notice under Section 13(2) was issued on 27.07.2018
claiming a sum of Rs.1,47,64,843/-. Symbolic possession was taken on
09.10.2018. District Magistrate passed an order dated 02.11.2018 on an
application under Section 14 (1) of the SARFAESI Act. Challenging the
action of the Bank SARFAESI Application was filed by the Respondent No.
1. Application for stay of the order of DM was filed on 02.11.2018. DM
order was stayed by DRT vide order dated 17.12.2018. On 08.01.2019, a
fresh order was passed by Ld. District Magistrate. On the basis of said
order, Appellant had taken physical possession on 10.01.2019. I.A. No. 15
of 2019 was filed by Respondent No. 1 challenging the order of DM dated
08.01.2019 which was dismissed.
3.
Secured assets were put to sale vide notice dated 19.01.2019 which
was challenged before DRT and the sale notice was set aside. Property was
sold on 30.03.2019 fixing the reserve price on the basis of the valuation
3
Appeal. No. 63 of 2019-DRAT-Kolkata
report dated 10.01.2019 which was fixed as Rs.1,70,37,920/-.
Sale
Certificate was issued on 31.03.2019. It was challenged by Respondent No.
1 by filing I.A. No. 148 of 2019 on the ground that property was sold for a
low value. Ld. DRT set aside the sale by impugned order holding that the
property ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.