SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SHREY PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
EMAAR MGF LAND PRIVATE LTD. – Respondent


C.P.No.134/2006

Page 1

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ COMPANY PETITION NO. 134/2006

% Date of Decision : October 9 , 2006

In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956

under Sections 391(2) to 393 of the Companies Act, 1956

Scheme of Amalgamation of

Shrey Promoters Private Limited

... Applicant/Transferor Company

with

EMAAR MGF Land Private Limited

... Applicant/Transferee Company

Mr. S GaneGanesh, Sr.Advocate with

Mr.Vikram Dhokalia and Mr. Kamal

Budiraja

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be

allowed to see the judgment? -

2006:DHC:53

C.P.No.134/2006

Page 2

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? Yes

3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes

in the Digest ?

SANJIV KHANNA, J

1.The present petition under Section 391(2) to 393 of the Companies Act,

1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by M/s Shrey

Promoters Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor

company) and M/s EMAAR MGF Land Private Limited (hereinafter

referred to as the transferee company).

2.The registered office(S) of the transferor company and the transferee

company are locate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top