SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Harish Chander – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Another – Respondent


W.P. (C) No. 15928/2004

Page 1 of 8

*

HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI

Date of decision: September 27, 2007

+

W.P. (C) No. 15928/2004

%

Harish Chander

...Petitioner

Through: Mr. D.C. Vohra, Advocate

versus

Union of India & Another

...Respondents

Through: Mr. Yogesh Verma, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported

in the Digest?

VIPIN SANGHI, J.

1. The Petitioner was appointed in the year 1970 as a Hindi

Typist by the respondents. He has since been confirmed in the said

post. The said post of Hindi Typist was an isolated one, and not

encadred in the Central Secretariat Clerical Services (CSCS), which is

governed by the Central Secretariat Clerical Services Rules (CSCS

Rules). Consequently, even after 28 years of service, the Petitioner was

not given even a single promotion, except upon the up gradation of the

2007:DHC:1209-DB

W.P. (C) No. 15928/2004

Page 2 of 8

post of Hindi Typist to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top