SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
M/S BANK KREISS AG – Appellant
Versus
MR ASHOK K. CHAUHAN & ORS. – Respondent


THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment delivered on: 23.10.2007

+

IA No.8275/2003 & IA No.8670/2003 in CS(OS) 675/1999

M/S BANK KREISS AG

... Plaintiff

- versus -

MR ASHOK K. CHAUHAN & ORS.

... Defendants

Advocates who appeared in this case:-

For the Plaintiff

: Mr R. K. Anand, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shivani Lal,

Mr S. B. Sharma and Mr Vishv Nidhi

For the Defendant No.1

: Mr Valmiki Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr Vinay Garg

For the Defendant Nos.2-13: Mr Arun Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Mr Rajesh Yadav and

Mr A. P. Singh

CORAM:-

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed

to see the judgment ?

YES

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

YES

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest ?

YES

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J

1.

Three interesting questions arise for consideration in these

applications. They are:-

(1) Whether a merging company, upon merger with

another company and thereby ceasing to exist as an

independent entity, could be construed as having

“died” upon such merger in the context of Order 22 of

the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?

2007:DHC:1309

(2) If yes, would a suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top