IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI

O.M.P. No. 554/2006

Judgment reserved on: December 20,

Date of decision: January 23,

DR. KUMARADAS

.... Petitioner

through: Mr. Rajeev Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sagar

Pathak,

Advocate

VERSUS

THE INDIAN MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS'

CO-OP. PHARMACY & STORES LTD. & ORS.

....Respondents

through: Mr. S. Nandkumar, Mr. S. Muthukrishnan,

Mr. G. Anandaselvan & Mr. Sathis Kumar,

Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be

allowed to see the Judgment?

Yes

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the

Digest?

Yes

GITA MITTAL, J

1.

By this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration &

Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction

of this court contending that he has raised an arbitration dispute

before the Central Registrar appointed under the provisions of the

O.M.P. No. 554/2006

page 1 of 31

2007:DHC:25

Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984 before the Central

Registrar at New Delhi under Section 84 of the Act. It is pointed

out that b