SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CONSTABLE GAJENDRA PRASHAD – Appellant
Versus
UOI & ANR. – Respondent


41

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P.(C) 6111/2007 & CM 11422/2007

CONSTABLE GAJENDRA PRASHAD ..... Petitioner

Through

Mr.R.K.Anand, Sr.Advocate with

Ms.Shivani Lal and Mr.Vishv

Nidhi, Advocates

versus

U.O.I & ANR

..... Respondent

Through

Mr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate

Ms.Jyoti Singh, Advocate for UOI

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.L.BHAYANA

(1)Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see

the Order?

Yes

(2)To be referred to the reporter or not?

Yes

(3)Whether the Order should be reported in the

Digest?

Yes

O R D E R

% 21.08.2007

It is not in dispute that while the Petitioner was

discharging his duties at Out-Post Phobrang at Laddaq in 1998-99

he suffered from frostbite. The Petitioner was placed in medical

category EEE due to “Pheripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) both

W.P.(C) 6111/2007                                                                          Page   1 of 8

2007:DHC:965-DB

lower limbs with Rt.SK and Lt. Toe amputation”. By

Memorandum dated 30.4.2001, keeping in view the type of job

fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top