DELHI HIGH COURT
CONSTABLE GAJENDRA PRASHAD – Appellant
Versus
UOI & ANR. – Respondent
41
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 6111/2007 & CM 11422/2007
CONSTABLE GAJENDRA PRASHAD ..... Petitioner
Through
Mr.R.K.Anand, Sr.Advocate with
Ms.Shivani Lal and Mr.Vishv
Nidhi, Advocates
versus
U.O.I & ANR
..... Respondent
Through
Mr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate
Ms.Jyoti Singh, Advocate for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.L.BHAYANA
(1)Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the Order?
Yes
(2)To be referred to the reporter or not?
Yes
(3)Whether the Order should be reported in the
Digest?
Yes
O R D E R
% 21.08.2007
It is not in dispute that while the Petitioner was
discharging his duties at Out-Post Phobrang at Laddaq in 1998-99
he suffered from frostbite. The Petitioner was placed in medical
category EEE due to “Pheripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) both
W.P.(C) 6111/2007 Page 1 of 8
2007:DHC:965-DB
lower limbs with Rt.SK and Lt. Toe amputation”. By
Memorandum dated 30.4.2001, keeping in view the type of job
fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.