SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
BALBAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Crl Appeal No. 921/2005 Page 1 of 11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CRL.A. No. 921 of 2005

Date of decision: May 6, 2008

BALBAN SINGH

..... Appellant

Through Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Amicus Curiae

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Through Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be

allowed to see the order?

Yes

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes

3. Whether the order should be reported

Yes

in Digest?

ORDER

Dr. S. Muralidhar, J. (open court)

1.

This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 9th September 2005

passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge („ASJ‟) (Special Court),

NDPS, Delhi convicting the Appellant under Section 20 of the Narcotics

Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 („NDPS Act‟) and an order

dated 16th September 2005 sentencing him to undergo rigor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top