SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
M/s. Shyam Telecom Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M/s. A.R.M. Ltd. – Respondent


FAO (OS) No. 198/2004 Page 1 of 15

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

FAO (OS) No. 198/2004

Reserved on:- 13th May, 2008

Date of Decision: May 30th, 2008

#M/s. Shyam Telecom Ltd. ..... Appellant.

!

Through Mr. Suresh Singh, Advocate

with Ms. Sunita Bansal, Adv.

and Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv.

Versus

$M/s. A.R.M. Ltd.

..... Respondent

Through Mr. Neeraj K. Kaul, Sr. Adv.

with Mr. Tajas Karia, Adv.

Ms. Anu Bagai, Advocate.

CORAM:

* HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SARIN

* HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be

allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

Yes.

3. Whether the judgment should be reported

Yes.

in the digest?

J U D G M E N T

MANMOHAN , J :

1. The Appellant has filed the present appeal being FAO (OS)

No. 198/2004 under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation

Act, 1996 and Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1996. In

this appeal the appellant has prayed for setting aside of the

2008:DHC:1841-DB

FAO (OS) No. 198/2004

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top