WP (C) No. 9468/2007 nsk

Page 1 of 15

Reportable

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

WP (C) No. 9468 of 2007

Reserved on : May 16, 2008

%

Pronounced on : July 04, 2008

Union of India

. . . Petitioner

through :

Mr. R.V. Sinha with

Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates

VERSUS

L.K. Puri & Anr.

. . . Respondents

through :

Mr. Vivek Chib, Advocate

for the respondent No.1.

Ms. Jyoti Singh, Advocate

for the respondent No.2.

CORAM :-

THE HON‟BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

THE HON‟BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed

to see the Judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest?

A.K. SIKRI, J.

1.

Union of India is not satisfied with the outcome of the OA filed by

the respondent No.1, Mr. L.K. Puri, before the Central Administrative

Tribunal inasmuch as the said OA of the respondent No.1 has been

allowed by the Tribunal vide its impugned judgment dated

24.1.2007 and the decision of the Government imposing the penalty

of reduction of pay by two stages vide orders dated 24.6.2005 has

been set aside. The petitioner maintains that such a decision was