SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Court on its own motion – Appellant
Versus
State and others – Respondent


WP (Crl.) No.796/2007

Page 1 of 112

*

HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI

+

WP (CRL.) NO. 796/2007

Judgment reserved on: May 2, 2008

%

Judgment delivered on: August 21st, 2008

Court on its own motion

…Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Arvind Nigam, Advocate and

Amicus Curiae

Versus

State & Others

…Respondents

Through:

Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. Vijay K. Sondhi, Mr. Varun

Pareek and Mr. Kapil Arora,

Advocates for NDTV.

Mr. Vinay Bhasin and Mr. Ashok

Bhasin, Sr. Advocates with

Ms. Shivani Lal and Mr. Vishv Nidhi,

Advocates for contemnor Mr. R.K.

Anand along with Mr. R.K Anand

in person.

Mr. P.P. Rao, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

Huzefa Ahmadi, Mr. H.R. Khan

Suhel, Mr. Amaan Khan and

Mr. Saif Khan, Advocates for

contemnor Mr. I.U. Khan with

Mr. I.U. Khan in person.

Mr. S.P. Kalra, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. Munish Malhotra for contemnor

Mr. Sri Bhagwan Sharma with

contemnor Mr. Sri Bhagwan Sharma

in person.

Coram:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SARIN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top