* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

LPA 446/2003

Reserved on : 27.08.2008

%

Date of decision:22.09.2008

M/s CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORP. & ANR. ….. …..APPELLANTS

Through: Mr.K.K.Tyagi, Advocate.

M/s BHARTIYA PLASTIC UDGYOG & ORS .. .. ...RESPONDENTS

Through:

Mr. Kamal Mehta, Advocate for R-1 and R-2.

None for R-3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG

1.

Whether the Reporters of local papers

may be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes

2.

To be referred to Reporter or not?

Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be

reported in the Digest?

Yes

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

1.

The refusal by the appellant to deliver the subsequent

consignment to respondent nos.1 and 2 on account of a

dispute about the non payment of warehousing charges for

the first consignment had given rise to the present

litigation. It is an undisputed fact that there was no

controversy of any alleged dues in respect of the second

consignment.

A

connected

question

arising

for

c